Új hozzászólás Aktív témák

  • Orgi

    őstag

    válasz Recon666 #2868 üzenetére

    A végkövetkeztetés szerintem is ez, de a Xonar nem hardveres szerintem...

    "Using my personal Database we can compare the latest cards that have been released for gaming audio comparisons. The Xonar Essence STX uses the latest DS3D GX 2.5 drivers these are EAX “emulation” drivers. The effectively intercept the direct sound EAX calls and translate them into effect calls that can be used by the Xonar’s DSP effects engine.

    This first graph is comparing 3 Xonar cards to a Hardware DSP equipped Auzentech Prelude.

    The data for the Xonar D2 was taken prior to the release of the GX2.0 drivers so this would explain why the graphs indicates the card is so hard on the CPU as there was no driver optimizations or gaming audio routines of any kind aside from EAX 2.0 support. The Xonar DX was tested with the GX 2.0 drivers so we can see the driver definitely improve the gaming audio atleast as far as CPU hit is concerned.

    The newest addition to my database is the Xonar Essence STX which is sporting brand spanking new GX 2.5 gaming drivers and we can see more optimizations as the new card tests better then the DX using GX 2.0 drivers. The Auzentech Prelude 7.1 is of course ahead of the pack flexing its hardware DSP muscle and ruling this test."

    innen az idézet

Új hozzászólás Aktív témák